Referências Bibliográficas:

  1. Acuña A et al. Periprosthetic joint infection rates across primary total hip arthroplasty surgical approaches: a systematic review and metaanalysis of 653,633 procedures. Archives of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery 2022
  2. Brian A et al. High complication rate with anterior total hip arthroplasties on a fracture table. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2011
  3. Corten K, Vanbiervliet J. Acetabular Exposure in the Efficient Direct Anterior THA. ICJR 2018
  4. Fagotti L et al. Posterior versus anterior approach to total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Acta Ortop Bras 2021
  5. Grammatopoulos G et al. Pelvic positioning in the supine position leads to more consistent orientation of the acetabular component after total hip arthroplasty.The Bone Joint Journal 2018
  6. Kamath A et al. Medical resource utilization and costs for total hip arthroplasty: benchmarking an anterior approach technique in the Medicare population. Journal of Medical Economics 2018
  7. Lanting B et al. Bikini versus traditional incision direct anterior approach: is there any difference in soft tissue damage? Hip International 2017
  8. Learning. Curve Orthop Clin N Am 2009
  9. Leunig M et al. Skin crease ‘Bikini’ incision for anterior approach total hip arthroplasty: surgical technique and preliminary results. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2013
  10. Leunig M et al. Skin crease ‘bikini’ incision for the direct anterior approach in total hip arthroplasty: a two to four-year comparative study in 964 patients. The Bone Joint Journal 2018
  11. Mayr E et al. A prospective randomized assessment of earlier functional recovery in THA patients treated by minimally invasive direct anterior approach: A gait analysis study. Clinical Biomechanics 2009
  12. Miller L et al. Does Surgical Approach Affect Outcomes in Total Hip Arthroplasty Through 90 Days of Follow-Up? A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis. The Journal of Arthroplasty 2018
  13. Opsomer G et al. Orthostatic retractor placement reduces operating time and post-operative inflammatory response during the learning curve of anterior approach THA. The journal of Orthopaedics 2020
  14. Seng B et al. Anterior-Supine Minimally Invasive Total Hip Ar throplasty: Defining the
  15. Sibia U et al. The Impact of Surgical Technique on Patient Reported Outcome Measures and Early Complications After Total Hip Arthroplasty. The Journal of Arthroplasty 2016
  16. Taunton MJ et al. Risk of dislocation by surgical approach following modern primary total hip arthroplasty. Orthopaedic proceedings 2019
  17. Tian S et al. Direct Anterior Approach THA Using a Morphometrically Optimized Femoral Stem, a Conventional Operating Table, without Fluoroscopy. The Journal of Arthroplasty 2018
  18. Triantafyllopoulos G et al. Surgical approach does not affect deep infection rate after primary total hip arthroplasty. Hip International 2019
  19. Wang et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of direct anterior approach versus posterior approach in total hip arthroplasty. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research 2018
  20. Wang et al. Direct anterior versus lateral approaches for clinical outcomes after total hip arthroplasty: a meta-analysis. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research 2019
  21. Yoo J et al. Gait analysis after total hip arthroplasty using direct anterior approach versus anterolateral approach: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 2019
  22. Yue C et al. Comparison of Direct Anterior and Lateral Approaches in Total Hip Arthroplasty A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA). Medicine 2015


© Dr. Inácio Ventura - Quadril e Joelho CRM DF 16921 / RQE 8387 / TEOT 11571 | CRM SP 222230 / RQE 93369. Todos os direitos reservados – Desenvolvido por WOLFMAKER